This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Pages

Selasa, 09 Juli 2013

2013 BMW M6

2013 BMW M6 by AC Schnitzer

2013 BMW M6 AC 300x184 2013 BMW M6 by AC Schnitzer
2013 BMW M6
German tuner AC Schnitzer declared a brand new upgrade package for the whole 2013 BMW M6 lineup: machine, convertible and Grand machine. With the new standardization kit, AC Schnitzer wished to prove that the model was specially designed for a lot of: more power, a lot of force, a lot of speed and a lot of mechanics.


As expected, AC Schnitzer spent most of its time underneath the hood of the 2013 BMW M6. The tuner updated the four.4-liter V-8 engine to deliver a complete of 620 power unit and 582 pound-feet of force — up from the stock 560 power unit and five hundred pound-feet of force. With the additional sixty power unit the M6 will currently hit a prime speed of 189 mph – up from the bottom a hundred and fifty five mph. to boot, AC Schnitzer declared that the granny machine variant currently carries a 0-to-100 km/h (62 mph) time of four.1 seconds — zero.1 seconds quicker than the quality model.
The additional power needed extra driving dynamics. to assist during this space, AC Schnitzer put in a brand new suspension spring kit that lowers the car’s ride by fifteen millimetre (0.59 inches) up front and twenty five millimetre (0.98 inches) at the rear.

2013 BMW M6 by AC Schnitzer intimately

AC Schnitzer didn’t stop at creating the M6 quicker and handle higher. It additionally put in a brand new mechanics package that has a brand new carbon-fiber front spoiler and rear diffuser, a chromed front grille, and a brand new rear spoiler that adds somewhat additional downforce. The tuner additionally offers a brand new sports muffler with twin chromed sport finish pipes.
For the inside, there’s a brand new “Black Line” aluminium cowl, aluminium pedal set and footrests, and floor mats in velours.
The automotive sits on a group of 20- or 21-inch weight-optimized wheels offered in numerous styles.
2013 BMW M6 by AC Schnitzer – zero to 186 mph

Rabu, 03 Juli 2013

Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX MR Gets POV look at Drive

 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX MR Gets POV look at Drive
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX MR
While the crew over at Winding Road Magazine sometimes focuses on doing raid Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX MR POV take a look at drives for the a lot of fascinating of latest cars, often feature a pleasant older ride, to reminds United States of America of simply however diluted cars are getting these days.
Compare just about any fashionable automotive with its older self, and you’ll begin to examine that the inevitable progress of the business has rendered its dashboard soft, along side its responses to your inputs. a similar applies to thereforeunds – I don’t very perceive why all cars are becoming so quiet well, I see the purpose for family rides, however not for sports cars, however it appears to be associate degree business obsession.
Thankfully, there’s nothing stopping you from boycotting the new automotive market altogether, and enjoying the wonders of eBay and specialist sites. you’ll land yourself a pleasant and loud Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR, and throw the clean minimum of mods straight exhaust makes it even louder. The result’s a machine just like the one featured during this shorter and quicker-driven POV video drive.
There’s one thing exciting concerning driving or being driven quickly in Evos, even a lot of therefore in in strong MR trim. Insulation from engine noise is poor, and whereas the straight-four engine doesn’t sound unhealthy, however it is not as nice as for example, a Subaru Impreza. Also, if I were to appear back at the history of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo IX MR and a few older versions, the manufacturing plant body kit wasn’t chosen with nice attention paid to the aesthetic facet – they were needlessly ugly and square.
source : http://priuscar.com/mitsubishi-lancer-evo-ix-mr-gets-pov-look-at-drive/

2014 Chevy Camaro Bumblebee Concept

2014 Chevy Camaro Bumblebee Concept 300x156 2014 Chevy Camaro Bumblebee Concept
2014 Chevy Camaro Bumblebee Concept
Only hours when our spies piqued our curiosity with a carload of far-away shots from the motion – picture photography set of Transformers 4 at the gramme workplace facility in Michigan, and including the new 2014 Chevy Camaro Bumblebee Concept, Michael Bay did it once more and born a political candidate photograph of the automobile.
Bay had antecedently showed America a 1967 Camaro – based bumblebee, and from what we tend to gather, that automobile can possible be used as Associate in Nursing entry within the film before the alleged 2014 construct 2014 Chevy Camaro Bumblebee Concept steps in to require the primary role.
Just as there is not any question that gramme can use the position of the Camaro within the film to launch a Transformers edition of the automobile onto the market (as it did with the previous films), there is additionally little question that it’ll look completely different than this idea that comes with a freshly designed face, completely different than the one we tend to saw on the facelifted model.
Other custom elements found 2014 Chevy Camaro Bumblebee Concept on the automobile embody the bottom effects kit, abundant wider rear fenders with air inlets, a fuel cap positioned on the rear quarter window and nearly flush door handles.
 source : http://priuscar.com/2014-chevy-camaro-bumblebee-concept/

2015 VW Golf GTD

2015 VW Golf GTD can come back to the US 300x162 2015 VW Golf GTD can come back to the U.S
2015 VW Golf GTD
Volkswagen plans to bring the new 2015 VW Golf GTD can come back to the u. s. along side the opposite models of the seventh-generation Golf, after all, says a report from Autonews. The GTD are the brand’s 1st performance-oriented diesel automobile ever sold-out within the u. s..
While the Golf and therefore the Golf GTI can launch stateside next year next year as 2015 models, the 2015 VW Golf GTD can arrive in 2015 as a 2016 model, in line with Andreas Valbuena, product manager for the VW Golf. The German automaker’s White House estimates the 2015 VW Golf GTD can have a beginning worth of around $27,000 (€20,750).
“We see it as a awfully vital a part of our full vary of offerings, a technology halo for our diesel technology,” Valbuena was quoted as language by Automotive News at a press making known.
He went on to mention that, VW estimates the VW Golf GTD  will form up between five and ten % of Golf diesel sales, that feels like a practical target, as Volkswagen’s U.S. diesel sales are on the increase latterly. VW is about to sell one hundred,000 diesels within the u. s. in 2013, ten % over last year. In 2012, VW sold 40,885 Golfs within the country.
Available as a three- and five-door hatchback, the 2015 VW Golf GTD is hopped-up by a a pair of.0-liter turbodiesel four-cylinder engine developing 184 postscript (181 hp) and 380 Nm (280 lb-ft) of torsion in European pretence. It sprints from zero to one hundred km/h (62 mph) in seven.5 seconds and reaches a prime speed of 230 km/h (143 mph). The Euro-spec 2015 VW Golf GTD averages four.2 liters/100 kilometre (56 mpg) and emits 109 g/km of carbon dioxide. to cut back nitroged oxides emissions, the automobile can use Associate in Nursing organic compound tank to be stuffed once homeowners can amendment their oil.
Launching this summer in Europe, the 2015 VW Golf GTD borrows the sports suspension of the Golf GTI, in addition because the additional aggressive body kit and interior upgrades.
source : http://priuscar.com/2015-vw-golf-gtd-can-come-back-to-the-u-s/

2014 Mazda 3 hatch

 2014 Mazda 3 hatch
2014 Mazda 3
There area unit several reasons why Mazda and its dealers area unit hyped concerning the new, third generation of the brand’s 2014 Mazda 3 hatchback, called Axela in Japan, which is able to before long be joined by a sedan variant.
Just to say a couple of, it’s a full ton higher, because of the edgier and additional well received, especially on the Mazda 6. Kodo style language, whereas additionally profiting from Mazda‘s suite of SkyActive technology comprising light-weight engines, transmissions, body and chassis.
It additionally comes with a recent assortment of contemporary gadgets –an space thatduring which the outgoing model lagged compared to its rivals- the foremost necessary of which area unit the new and up up to now, documentary film, property and safety systems.
We’ll get to be told additional concerning the new 2014 Mazda 3  hatch and therefore the sedan model over the approaching weeks, however within the meanwhile, you’ll be able to take a more in-depth cross-check the automobile in these videos that were shot throughout the media presentation of the motorcar round the world.
source : http://priuscar.com/2014-mazda-3-hatch/

2013 Ford Focus ST hot hatchback

2013 Ford Focus ST 300x183 2013 Ford Focus ST hot hatchback
2013 Ford Focus ST
Ford has declared the official fuel economy numbers for its new 2013 Ford Focus ST hot hatchback.
The five door model with the two.0 liter turbocharged EcoBoost engine rated at 252 H.P. and 270 pound.-ft can come back associate EPA estimated 23mpg (10.2lt/100km) in town driving, 32mpg (7.35lt/100km) on the main road and a combined label of 26mpg (9.0lt/100km).
For reference, the soon-to-be replaced 200hp VW Golf GTI Mk6 is certified at 21mpg town and 31mpg main road, whereas the 263hp 2012 Mazda Speed 3 earns associate independent agency rating of 18mpg town and 25mpg main road.
Keep in mind that the new Ford Focus ST is obtainable solely with a 6-speed manual case that turns the front wheels.
The Blue Oval’s sported up hatchback can shortly press on sale within the States with a beginning value of $23,700, not as well as a $795 delivery and handing fee.
source : http://priuscar.com

Car Insurance For College Students



Car insurance for college students provides vehicle coverage to individuals who are studying toward a degree. Finding and selecting car insurance for college student programs is relatively easy, especially if the parents are involved in the process. To find inexpensive coverage, it is very important for the individual to maintain a good driving record. Also, many programs will provide benefits for an individual with good grades. With the cost of insurance and education so high, it is very important for any individual attending college to seek an affordable and comprehensive policy.

If the parents are involved in this process, finding a policy will be much easier, and often, less expensive. As long as the individual is not over a certain age and still enrolled in school, most companies will allow the child to remain on the parents policy. Receiving car insurance for college students should start with the parents current company. If they do not have a program that will offer car insurance for college student programs at a good rate, there are several more companies that will fit the needs of the clients.

A good driving record is very helpful when pursuing vehicle coverage. Tickets, accidents, parking citations, and anything negative attached to a driving record will put a blemish on the individuals driving record. When seeking car insurance for college students, any such negative mark on the record will be seen as a risk to the company. When risk becomes a factor, the cost of coverage will likely be increased by a large sum of money.

Many of these programs provide the option for a discount for good grades. Usually, the average grades must be a B average before the discount is given. This discount can save quite a bit of money and will depend on the discretion of the company. Along with this discount, many other discounts may exist, depending on the company, state, or college in which the student is attending. It is very important to review and research all available information when pursuing car insurance for college students.

Finding the right coverage program for someone attending college can be difficult. There is a great need for the individual to use their knowledge and discretion to find the best car insurance for college student program. With so many companies and policies available, the best deals and options can often blend together making it difficult to tell the difference between providers and plans. In this case, the student must pray for guidance from the Lord in order to choose the best path for them. "Then they cry unto the LORD in their trouble, and he bringeth them out of their distresses.

Selasa, 02 Juli 2013

How To Get Cheap Car Insurance



With gas prices being the way they have people all over the country have started to get creative with their finances and the costs associated with auto travel.

Prices vary from company to company, so it pays to shop around. Get at least four to five price quotes. You will find that there are several websites out there that can save you the time from doing this the slow and hard way as they will often get you quotes from up to a dozen companies all at once. You can call companies directly or access information on the Internet. Your state insurance department may also provide comparisons of prices charged by major insurers. And no, companies like Progressive that claim they will compare other companies, but they are an insurance company, so they are not to be trusted. They only have one interest, and that is to promote their own business.

Bigger is not always better. There are several low cost automobile insurance companies offering competitive rates in relation to the big names out there. This makes it possible to save a bundle on this expense. Many people seem to ignore this cost and tend to accept the burden of expensive insurance even when monthly payments almost match a car payment. In one case, I lowered my car insurance rates by about 50% when I found a good local company (I had switched from a really big name company).

One of the best ways to get cheap car insurance is simply to use a service that forces insurance agents and brokers to compete against one another. At the end of this article is one example of such a site. As soon as you finish your online quote request, multiple agents will contact you. But it is important to NOT sign up with any one of them immediately-Instead, let them know that you are awaiting calls from other local insurance providers. After 5 or so of these people have contacted you, you should have a good idea of what sort of range you might expect to pay.

Then, if you really want to get the cheapest car insurance possible, simply tell the agents that you are ready to buy within the next 24 hours with whichever company offers you the lowest insurance rates. This really puts the fire under them, and is sure to create the most optimal pricing for you. Of course, be sure to carry through on your promise.

If it makes sense, you may want to consider getting a bundle package. Basically, see what it might cost to insure not only your car, but also your home, property, health and life insurance. This can save a person around 10% - 30% depending on the company you go with; and it does make paying your bills easier as well.

Oh, and one more tip, remember that the more info you provide upfront, the more accurate your quotes will be, and the more likely the insurance companies will be responsive to your inquiry. This is especially true when filling out a quote from multiple companies.

Senin, 01 Juli 2013

Nissan : GT-R (Skyline) 2009


Drivetrain
Transmission 6 Speed DSG Manual
Layout Front Engine, AWD
Final Drive Ratio 3.70:1
Differential 1.5 Way Mechanical Limited Slip
Brakes Brembo 4 Wheel Disc - 15 in. Front and Rear

Engine
Horsepower 480 hp @ 6400 rpm
Torque 430 ft-lbs. @ 3200 rpm
Displacement 3.8 liters
Engine Type Twin Turbo 24V V6


Exterior
Length 183.3 in
Width 74.6 in
Height 54 in
Wheelbase 109.5 in

Performance
Acceleration 0-60 mph s 3.3 sec
Drag Coefficient 0.27

Selasa, 07 Mei 2013

2013 Toyota blue G Sports

2013 Toyota Aqua G Sports, Toyota can provide proof that the hybrid technology is “no barrier to making fulgurant custom concepts” at the 2013 Tokyo automotive vehicle Salon the. it’ll bring home the bacon this with the revealing of the Aqua G Sports — a thought automotive supported the Prius hatchback a model that quickly become one in every of Japan’s popular cars since its launch last year.
Gazoo athletics and Toyota disclosed a special body kit for the Toyota Aqua, otherwise referred to as the Prius C. The hybrid one.5-liter engine has been left mostly untouched, however they only couldn’t resist golf shot on a sports muffler.
However, the cosmetic changes ar placing, beginning with novel front and rear bumpers, and aspect skirts and a collection of 17-inch alloys with 195/45 R17 tires. We’re particularly keen on the massive intake with Audi-style horizontal chrome bars.
As so much because the interior goes, the Toyota Aqua gets new sports seats, a distinct trim end and metallic element pedals.
source : priuscar.com

2013 Toyota TMG EV P002

The 2012 Pikes Peak International Hill Climb was quite an sure-fire one for Toyota, because the company set a replacement electron volt record of 10:15.380 up Capitol Hill within the electrical category. For this year’s hill climb, the corporate ready associate improved version of its auto in a trial to interrupt its previous run.
This year, America and Europe’s motorsport teams will work together (TMG and TRD USA): the prototype has been sent to the United States by TMG to be reviewed by TRD USA.
The driver remains within the center of the automobile whereas a jutting wing is currently placed at the front. This 2013 version offers additional power and force: 400kW of power (536hp rather than 470hp before) and 1200nm of torque (900nm for the 2012 version) for a most speed of 230kph, the electron volt P002 is supercharged by a 42kWh metal Ceramic battery.
For the record, the TMG electron volt P002 additionally set a record on the Nurburgring.
Regarding the 2013 edition of Pikes Peak and therefore the electrical cars which will participate, Tajima has not however conferred a 2013 e-Runner and Mitsubishi hasn’t declared the come back of the i-MiEV Evolution either.
source : http://priuscar.com/2013-toyota-tmg-ev-p002/

Selasa, 15 Januari 2013

Could Diesel Fuel Made from US Natural Gas Compete with CNG and LNG?

The announcement last month of a $21 billion project to capitalize on abundant, low-cost US natural gas should have caught the attention of everyone interested in this resource. As reported in the New York Times, Sasol, a South African energy company, intends to build a 96,000 barrel-per-day gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant in southwestern Louisiana, in conjunction with a new gas processing plant and ethylene cracker. The synthetic diesel fuel produced by this facility would provide a different pathway for shale gas to displace imported crude oil in the US transportation sector, in competition with compressed or liquefied natural gas (CNG or LNG.)

GTL involves a two-step conversion of the methane that makes up the bulk of natural gas into synthesis gas and hydrogen, which are recombined into liquid hydrocarbons by means of the decades-old Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process. GTL is also energy-intensive, with an overall efficiency around 60%. South African companies have vast experience with such synthetic fuels. Sasol are partners in the Oryx GTL plant in Qatar, and their coal-to-liquids plants in South Africa utilize a similar syngas step and the same FT process as GTL.

With the US suddenly perceived to be sitting atop a century's worth of natural gas, mainly in the form of unconventional gas from shale, tight gas formations and coal-bed methane, T. Boone Pickens isn't the only one to see an opportunity to displace imported oil with gas. Yet as attractive as that sounds for reasons of energy security and trade, it isn't obvious whether the public or even fleet operators are willing to switch on a larger scale to a lower-density gaseous fuel requiring both new distribution networks and new or modified powertrains. Only 0.1% of the natural gas consumed in the US now finds its way into vehicles, equivalent to less than 0.1% of US oil demand. Under the circumstances, it would be surprising if someone weren't looking seriously at GTL, one of the few practical ways to circumvent the mechanical and logistical barriers that have impeded the fueling of more US cars and trucks with natural gas.

When I read about Sasol's proposed project, I immediately thought of another, less well-known South African synfuels facility. Since 1992 the Mossel Bay GTL plant has been turning natural gas into gasoline, diesel and other fuels, drawing first on the Mossel Bay gas field and then on newer fields as the original one depleted. Although owned by another firm, the ongoing struggles to keep the "Mossgas" plant supplied are well-known in South African energy circles. I can't imagine Sasol embarking on a project like the one in Louisiana if they had any doubt about their ability to keep it supplied for decades.

Of course volume and price are two very different aspects of supply. A decade ago, conventional wisdom held that GTL required a gas cost of around $1 per million BTUs to be viable. Even with the shale bonanza today's US natural gas price is well above that level. What now makes it possible to conceive of GTL in the US is that the price of the crude oil used to make diesel and other fuels has risen so much higher than that of natural gas. That comparison is more obvious when one converts natural gas prices into their energy equivalent in crude oil. Today's US natural gas price is below the $23 per equivalent barrel that it was in 2001. Meanwhile crude oil has increased from about $26 to $95 per barrel. The drastically improved attraction of GTL becomes even clearer when comparing ten years of wholesale US Gulf Coast diesel prices to natural gas prices using the approximate GTL conversion rate of 10 million BTUs of gas per barrel of liquid product.


Picture

As the chart above reveals, this theoretical GTL margin has exploded since 2009. Yet it also shows that if gas prices returned to the levels we experienced just a few years earlier, the proposed project would encounter significant risks. Perhaps that helps explain Sasol's concept of a larger integrated gas complex with multiple sources of margin, capitalizing on the waste heat from the GTL process and the lighter hydrocarbons it yields as byproducts.

It remains to be seen whether GTL will prove an attractive means of leveraging the US shale gas revolution to back out imported oil. However, if Sasol and others proceed with US GTL projects, anyone eyeing our gas surplus for other purposes, whether in manufacturing, fertilizer production or power generation, would face serious competition linked to the global oil market. That includes potential LNG exporters, who passed an important hurdle with the publication of a favorable analysis by the Department of Energy.

A slightly different version of this posting was previously published on the website of Pacific Energy Development Corporation

Rabu, 09 Januari 2013

Virginia's Gas Tax: Ending A "Dinosaur Tax"

I don't know if the Speaker of Virginia's House of Delegates intended a double entendre when he referred to the state gasoline tax that Governor Bob McDonnell (R) just proposed eliminating as a "dinosaur tax".  He was certainly correct that this tax is rapidly becoming outmoded as its capacity to keep pace with necessary infrastructure investment fades with every EV, hybrid, or other efficient car that's sold.   In the Governor's remarks, he referred to the gas tax as a "stagnant revenue source." In a low-tax state like the Commonwealth, shifting the tax burden for transportation away from fuel taxes and toward registration fees and a higher general sales tax represents an innovative, though also controversial answer to a challenge that has concerned me for some time. 

The scope of the underlying problem should be uncontroversial: Like most states, Virginia's $0.175 per gallon gasoline tax is a holdover from an era in which fuel sales grew in tandem with road use, and both expanded steadily year after year.  I can personally vouch for Northern Virginia's traffic congestion, cited in this morning's Washington Post story on this issue. As in most states, Virginia's gasoline sales have been flat to declining since the recession that began in 2008, while the value of the fixed fuel tax has been further eroded by inflation.  These trends seem likely to continue for years, with recent new-car fuel economy improving sharply. The gas tax simply can't cover the cost of repairing and extending Virginia's highways without a large increase now, followed by periodic increases as future fuel sales fall. 

A key aspect of Governor McDonnell's proposal that appeals to me is that it doesn't rely on high-tech monitoring or low-tech inspections of actual miles driven, like many of the other solutions I've examined.  Instead of trying to fix the fuel-tied tax, he would eliminate it entirely and shift revenue generation to a combination of higher annual fees, especially for alternative fuel vehicles that currently pay little or no road tax, and an increase in the Commonwealth's 5% sales tax to 5.8%.  0.5% of the current sales tax is already dedicated to transportation.  The proposed shift exchanges one regressive tax for another, in a manner that recognizes that all Virginians stand to benefit from improved transportation networks, whether they personally use them or not. 

The current Virginia gas tax costs an average motorist around $100 per year, based on 12,000 miles of annual driving.  The rise in the sales tax would generate comparable revenue from $12,000 of annual spending subject to the sales tax.  That likely equates to little or no tax increase for low-income drivers, and an increase of up to a few hundred dollars a year for the better-off, while still leaving Virginia's sales tax slightly lower than those in Maryland and the District of Columbia. Motorists would continue to pay the federal gasoline tax, currently set at $0.184/gal.

I can envision various objections to the Governor's proposal, including concerns that cutting the gas tax might increase gasoline demand--and emissions--and reduce the incentives for higher fuel efficiency.  That seems unlikely in the current context for at least two reasons.  First, eliminating the Virginia gas tax involves a reduction in pump prices of less than 5% of last year's average price in the region, and more importantly represents less than a quarter of the total range of gas-price volatility we experienced in 2012. Moreover, fuel economy improvements are already mandated under the new federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy regulations that will increase fleet-average miles per gallon to 54.5 mpg by 2025.  Cars will continue to become more efficient, no matter what gasoline costs.

It will be interesting to watch how this proposal fares in Richmond.  The Governor's party may control the House of Delegates and effectively the Senate, by virtue of a tie-breaking Lieutenant Governor, but 2013 is an election year, and Mr. McDonnell is barred by term limits from seeking reelection. I wish him luck with this idea, even though its enactment would probably result in a small net tax increase for my household. I'm sure other states will be watching, too.

Rabu, 02 Januari 2013

A Late Christmas Gift for Renewable Energy

The US Senate's "fiscal cliff" package wasn't exactly eight maids a-milking--the traditional gift for the eighth day of Christmas--though it did apparently resolve the impending "milk cliff".  Of greater relevance, the "tax extender" portion of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 passed by both the Senate and House of Representatives represented a gift to renewable energy producers and developers worth around $18 billion.  Two-thirds of that is attributable to the extension and modification of the Production Tax Credit (PTC) for wind and other renewable electricity projects. Renewable energy technologies have gained another year of generous support from US taxpayers.  What remains to be seen is whether this win represents a last hurrah for the current US approach to renewable energy subsidies as lawmakers focus on shrinking an increasingly unsustainable federal budget deficit.

Based on the analysis of the bill provided in the Wall St. Journal, other energy-related beneficiaries  included producers of cellulosic and algae-based biofuels, blenders of conventional biodiesel and other alternative fuels, purchasers of 2- and 3-wheeled electric vehicles, as well as various energy efficiency investments including efficient homes and appliances.  Renewables should also benefit from other provisions of the bill, including a one-year extension of 50% bonus depreciation on project investments and a two-year extension of the 20% R&D tax credit. 

Of course the problem with all of this is that it sets up additional cliffs at the end of 2013 and 2014, and thus perpetuates the expiration-anxiety roller-coaster that has confounded both manufacturers and investors in these technologies. Part of the blame for that rests with the process by which the Congress drafts and enacts such legislation.  However, it's also a function of the unwillingness of current beneficiaries to shift their lobbying efforts to support realistic and predictable phaseouts of these subsidies, in light of renewables' improving competitiveness with conventional energy and the magnitude of future US fiscal problems.  Considering that the current PTC for wind power is worth the equivalent of about 90% of today's futures price for natural gas, a proposal by the wind trade association for a six-year phaseout ending at 60% strikes me as too much like St. Augustine's plea for chastity.

The high-pressure negotiations to avert the fiscal cliff provided a poor venue for producing genuine tax reform, while giving supporters of the status quo a golden opportunity to attach measures such as these "extenders" that couldn't be amended before the expiration of the current Congress.  The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that this bill actually increased federal spending by a net $330 billion over 10 years and added nearly $4 trillion to the deficit, compared to going over the cliff.  It's not clear that the even higher-stakes debt-ceiling debate slated for early in the new Congress will be any more conducive to solving these challenges. But whether then or later in the session, it's going to become harder to avoid some form of tax reform and spending discipline that considers all energy subsidies in the context of their direct costs and indirect revenues. I'll be surprised if the current subsidies for renewables can escape again without major adjustments to reduce their high effective cost per unit of energy produced and increase their long-term bang for the buck. 

Kamis, 20 Desember 2012

2012: The Year in Energy

As in most recent years, energy was constantly in the news in 2012. A post attempting to catalog every noteworthy story or event would be quite long.  However, a few big trends stand out. For starters, it's a near-certainty that the average US gasoline price will set a new record for the second year running, in both real and nominal terms. Americans are responding by choosing more fuel efficient cars. Meanwhile, fundamental shifts emerged from obscurity into the awareness of policy makers and the public.  US energy exports have become a mainstream topic of conversation, and the goal of energy independence--a concept with debatable meanings--has acquired renewed respectability after spending a couple of decades on the fringes of energy policy debate.  Perhaps more significantly, our views of climate change and future oil supplies--once aligned--have diverged. 

For renewable energy it has been the best and worst of years.  Global overcapacity in solar equipment manufacturing drove down the costs of solar panels, at least partly counteracting reductions in government incentives, especially in Europe, and making solar power more competitive.  The US is on track to add a record 3,200 MW of solar capacity this year, while China could add 5,000 MW.  However, solar manufacturers' rapid expansion depressed their margins and extended last year's string of solar bankruptcies, with firms like Abound Solar, Konarka, Solarwatt, Q-Cells and others forced to restructure or liquidate in 2012.  A similar, if less dramatic wave is working through the more mature onshore wind industry, which faces the expiration of a key US incentive, the Production Tax Credit, or PTC on December 31.  In anticipation of that loss, wind developers have added 4,728 MW of new capacity in the US through the first three quarters of 2012, the most since 2009.

Energy played a complex and possibly decisive role in the US presidential election.  Remarkably, President Obama successfully co opted his opponent's energy platform by embracing an oil and gas revival that his administration had done little to help and much to hinder, even though it appeared to conflict with his emphasis on renewable energy and climate change mitigation.  Meanwhile, the shale gas revolution was creating hundreds of thousands of direct and indirect jobs and lowering energy costs across the economy, contributing to US manufacturing competitiveness.  The resulting economic growth, while still below the level of other post-war recoveries, apparently helped the President make his case for a second term.

The inherent tension between surging US oil and natural gas production and concerns about climate change--fanned by Hurricane Sandy--reflects a major shift that occurred this year, at least as an influence on future energy policy.  Recall that until recently, memories of past energy crises, combined with the influential Peak Oil perspective, shaped our expectations of resource availability and future production.  This narrative of hydrocarbon scarcity complemented prescriptions for a rapid transition away from fossil fuels as the only viable solution to climate change, supporting a shared goal of a more sustainable energy economy based on renewable energy, smart grids and electric vehicles.   The exploitation of unconventional oil and gas resources in previously inaccessible source rock--shale gas and "tight" or shale oil--poses significant challenges to both strands of that argument.

First, it undermines the notion of energy scarcity for at least the next decade, and probably well beyond.  US natural gas production set a new record this year, and US oil production returned to levels not seen since 1997, putting increased pressure on OPEC's control over global oil pricing. Nor does the US have a monopoly on these unconventional resources. Canada looks like the next big shale gas play, with China and South Africa possibly not be far behind.  The technologies that enabled the US shale gas revolution and its oil offspring are being transferred around the world.

Yet we also learned that US energy-related CO2 emissions have fallen back to 1992 levels, largely because of a dramatic reduction in the use of coal in power generation.  While renewable energy sources like wind and solar power deserve some of the credit, natural gas-fired turbines--driven by cheap shale gas--have added three times as much net generation since 2007 as non-hydro renewables.

Shale gas and oil might not provide a long-term solution to global warming, but they could at least buy us the time to develop the innovations like improved electric vehicle batteries and low-cost grid-storage that will be necessary if renewables are to displace fossil fuels across the entire spectrum of their use--and dominance.  They could also provide the time to develop and deploy the next generation of nuclear power, including small modular reactors.

I'd like to thank my readers for your continued interest and encouragement and wish you a happy holiday season.

Rabu, 12 Desember 2012

Should Alaska Export More LNG to Asia?

The Governor of Alaska reportedly met this week with officials from the South Korean national gas company to discuss exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Ever since crude oil production on Alaska's North Slope ramped up in the 1980s, industry observers have speculated about the ultimate disposition of the significant associated natural gas reserves found with the oil. In a letter filed with the state of Alaska, BP, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil, the three main North Slope producers, together with pipeline company Transcanada, recently confirmed their plans for a potential liquefied natural gas (LNG) project, instead of the long-mooted pipeline to deliver the gas to America's lower-48 states. The contemplated megaproject would validate both the scale of Asia's future LNG market and the long-term nature of the US shale gas revolution.

Alaska's North Slope has already yielded
15 billion barrels of oil. Production peaked at over 2 million barrels per day in 1988 and subsequently declined to less than 600,000 barrels per day last year. With around 6 billion barrels of remaining reserves, it's still a very significant field but well past its prime. While the public has focused on its oil output, the producers and the state have long had their eyes on how best to harvest the value of the 35 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas dissolved in the oil. In fact, the North Slope complex has produced several TCF per year
of gas for years, ranking it among the largest gas fields in the world, but almost all of that gas has been reinjected into the formation to aid oil recovery--and for lack of a market in an isolated and sparsely-populated state.

For decades the default assumption was that
a pipeline would eventually be built across Alaska and Canada to link this gas to the existing network feeding the contiguous US. That idea gained traction when US marketed gas production stalled around 2000 and then began to decline. The economics of an Alaskan gas pipeline compared poorly with gas produced along the Gulf Coast, but competing with rising LNG imports looked much more feasible. Then along came unconventional gas, starting with coal-bed methane and culminating with the surge of shale production since 2005. The US gas market now has enough domestic supply to shrink coal's contribution to US power generation by 7% since 2008
and revive gas-intensive industries.

If shale gas were only a short-term phenomenon, as some have suggested, it would be of little relevance to the plans of the North Slope producers. All they'd need to do would be to delay their pipeline for a few more years, and the market would come to them. However, estimates put US shale gas resources at between
482 and 686 TCF--a 60-90 year supply at current shale production rates. And the fact that all three of the main North Slope producers have invested in significant acreage positions and production in US shale basins
surely gives them insights into the longevity of those resources.
Nor is time on the side of the Alaskan producers. As oil production declines the economics of the North Slope operation will deteriorate, while keeping the Trans Alaska Pipeline full becomes more problematic. Finding an attractive outlet for the North Slope "gas cap" wouldn't just provide a new revenue source; it could keep oil production going for additional decades.


The LNG option offers several advantages, despite its estimated $45-65 billion price tag and technical complexity. For starters, it cuts roughly 1,000 miles of difficult terrain off the distance that the gas must be pipelined, in this case to a site on the southern Alaskan coast. That location is much closer to Asia, the world's largest LNG market, than export projects intended to ship LNG from the US Gulf Coast. The Asian market is also growing, thanks in part to Japan's post-Fukushima reassessment of nuclear power. The Japanese government has backed away, at least for now, from plans for a firm nuclear phase-out, but it seeks to diversify its energy sources. Among other steps taken in the aftermath of the Sendai quake and nuclear disaster, it has instituted the world's most attractive solar power incentives. Yet Japan's solar resources provide just a few hours of peak output per day, on average, requiring substantial fossil fuel generation to fill in the gaps. Power plants burning LNG are well-suited to that task.

China presents a more complex picture, with its own significant
shale gas potential and an energy market expected to add as much
natural gas demand by 2035 as all the world's developed countries put together. Considering the scale of eventual demand and the infrastructure necessary to bring China's shale gas to market, it seems likely that the growth of the market in the interim must depend heavily on LNG imports.

Assuming that the state of Alaska presents no obstacles and that US export permits would be forthcoming, because Alaskan LNG exports wouldn't impact US natural gas prices, the main questions that will determine the future of this project can't be answered definitively today. Among these are whether the numerous competing LNG projects being planned and built around the Pacific Rim and elsewhere will saturate the global market in the meantime, and whether the market will provide an attractive price for Alaskan LNG, influenced more by crude oil prices than by US shale gas. The North Slope producers are already immersed in these issues via their other activities, including ConocoPhillips' small
LNG plant in Kenai, Alaska, which has been shipping LNG to Asia for more than 40 years. The project timeline provided to the state includes at least three go/no-go decisions along the way as the answers to these questions unfold.


A slightly different version of this posting was previously published on the website of Pacific Energy Development Corporation.

Kamis, 06 Desember 2012

IEA Expects Global Energy Focus to Shift Eastward

Last month the International Energy Agency (IEA) released its annual long-term forecast, the World Energy Outlook (WEO). Its projection that US oil output would exceed that of Saudi Arabia within five years was featured in numerous headlines, although some of the report's other findings look equally consequential. That includes the continued strong growth of energy demand in China, India and other Asian countries, and the linkages between that growth and a dramatic expansion of Iraqi oil production. The agency also set a cautionary tone concerning the increase in global greenhouse gas emissions accompanying all this growth.

In the IEA's primary "New Policies" scenario, the US overtakes Saudi Arabia in oil production by 2017, adding 4 million barrels per day (MBD) of unconventional output, mainly from shale (tight oil) deposits such as the Bakken in North Dakota. US oil imports decline significantly, due in roughly equal measure to higher production and the implementation of strict vehicle fuel economy regulations. As a consequence, the need for imports from the Middle East approaches zero within 10 years. When this change is combined with the growth in oil demand in Asia, where China alone accounts for half the forecasted global growth in oil consumption in this period, the IEA envisions Asia becoming the recipient of 90% of Middle East oil exports by 2035.

The detailed assumptions behind the IEA's conclusions weren't provided in the public release. These include crucial questions such as the assumed status of US rules barring most crude oil exports. As noted in a Reuters op-ed at the time, maximizing the potential of US unconventional resources may depend on allowing higher quality unconventional oil to seek global markets, while continuing to import oil from Latin America and the Middle East into Gulf Coast refineries geared to these heavier, higher-sulfur feedstocks. The op-ed's author also reminded us that the natural gas liquids included in the headline comparison with Saudi production are useful but quite different from crude oil, yielding little gasoline and diesel fuel.

The expected growth of energy demand in China remains extraordinary, even with the country's economic growth slowing from the levels seen a few years ago. To put this in context, when Dr. Fatih Birol, Chief Economist of the IEA, presented the new WEO to the media in London on November 12th, he suggested that China's electricity demand would grow by the equivalent of "one US and one Japan of today" by 2035. Much of that additional electricity generation is projected to come from renewables, nuclear power and domestic gas. Nevertheless, and in spite of significant increases in China's unconventional gas production, the IEA forecasts that import dependence will grow from about 15% for gas and 50% for oil today, to 40% for gas and over 80% for oil by 2035. That increase in imports would equate to additional hundreds of millions of dollars per year of outflows for energy.

In the view of the IEA, much of the extra oil demanded in Asia will be supplied by Iraq, which they project will increase its output from around 3 MBD today to 6.1 MBD in 2020 and 8.3 MBD in 2035, in the process becoming the world's second-largest oil exporter, after Russia. Since the reserves to support that growth have already been identified, with much lower production costs than many other basins, the uncertainties involved are mainly political and structural. Resolution of the current standoff with Iran over its nuclear program would provide even more Middle East oil for Asian markets.

As in its earlier "Golden Age of Gas" scenario, the IEA expects large increases in global natural gas consumption. Unconventional sources, mainly in the US, China and Australia, would contribute around half the additional production required to meet expanded demand. However, at the launch presentation in London Dr. Birol also stressed that unconventional oil and gas are still at an early stage, with significant uncertainties about the eventual magnitude of their resources. This seemed to be a particular issue for the agency's post-2020 forecast of oil production in the US and gas production in China.

Despite the rigorous analysis and level of detail involved in producing the IEA's World Energy Outlook, long-term energy forecasting should always be taken with a grain of salt. Yet whether or not the highlighted trends mature precisely in line with these projections, the shifts that the IEA identified are significant and already becoming evident in current data for energy production, consumption and trade. Even if North America failed to become a net oil exporter--which many equate with energy independence--by 2030, the movement of the center of gravity of global energy trade towards Asia is essentially pre-determined: baked in by differences in economic growth rates and resource opportunities. The economic, geopolitical and environmental consequences of that shift are just starting to take shape.

A slightly different version of this posting was previously published on the website of Pacific Energy Development Corporation.

Kamis, 29 November 2012

Does the Gas Tax Belong in the Fiscal Cliff Fix?

Recently I've seen several articles along the lines of this one from CNN, suggesting that an increase in the federal gasoline tax might be included in negotiations to avert the impending US "fiscal cliff".  While the gap between the gas tax, which was last raised in 1993, and highway repair costs grows each year, that's not just because past Congresses and administrations have been reluctant to hike it again.  As I've discussed in previous posts, gas tax revenue is declining for structural reasons related to curtailed driving, rising fuel economy and alternative fuel vehicles.  Simply adding another 10-15 ¢ per gallon to the current 18.4 ¢ tax wouldn't solve the long-term problem, although it would raise enough revenue to allow us to continue to ignore these growing challenges for a few years.  For that and other reasons, changing the gas tax deserves closer scrutiny than the waning hours of a preoccupied lame-duck Congress can provide.

Yesterday I attended another excellent event held by Resources for the Future in Washington, DC.  This one was devoted to "The Future of Fuel."  The panel discussion began with a presentation of the current energy forecast of the Energy Information Agency (EIA) highlighting the shifting energy mix the agency expects between now and 2035.  Although the slide deck didn't include the chart below, taken from EIA's 2012 Annual Energy Outlook, I couldn't help thinking of it in the context of both yesterday's meeting and the question of future fuel tax revenues. 


The EIA forecasts US gasoline demand to decline by about 8% from current levels by 2035 as cars meeting the new federal fuel economy standard enter the fleet, along with small but growing numbers of vehicles running on electricity and other non-petroleum fuels. An 8% drop in gasoline sales--and thus gas tax revenues--doesn't sound large until you realize that the current gas tax system was predicated on consistently rising gasoline sales as a means of expanding revenues. That's crucial, because highway construction and maintenance costs rise each year, too.  If gasoline sales were still growing at the 1% annual rate typical when the gas tax was last increased, gas tax revenues would be at least 37% higher by 2035 than the level the EIA would now project.

Stepping back from the details, the government faces a fundamental disconnect between its need to raise sufficient funds from the gas tax to cover the cost of maintaining the nation's road network and explicit federal policies aimed at reducing our consumption of the fuels being taxed.  Another one-time bump in the gas tax, whether of 5¢, 10¢ or 15¢ per gallon, will again be overtaken by the combined forces of inflation and declining volumes.  Fortunately, this problem is well-understood and a number of solutions are under consideration.  Inconveniently, many of them involve basic and controversial changes in how the road tax would be collected, such as shifting to a mileage-based tax assessed via annual inspections or real-time GPS monitoring. 

No one should expect or desire the 112th Congress to resolve these issues between now and the end of its term in January, particularly when the money at stake represents such a tiny fraction of either the fiscal cliff's package of tax increases and spending cuts or of the entire federal deficit.  I'm also not sure that reforming the gas tax belongs within the larger federal tax reform effort that should be undertaken next year, because the issues involved are so different from those associated with revamping the business, income, and payroll taxes.  Even a temporary fuel surtax would likely encounter strong opposition, due to its regressive nature and coincidence with gasoline prices that, despite recent declines, remain at or near seasonal record highs.  Unlike the rest of the fiscal cliff, this might just be one can that would benefit from being kicked down the road, at least past the current crisis.

Selasa, 20 November 2012

EPA Unwavering in Support for Ethanol, Despite Drought

Last Friday the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rejected the petitions of a bi-partisan group of state governors for a waiver of the federal ethanol mandate, resolving one of several energy-related issues that had been deferred beyond the presidential election.  The waiver requests filed in August cited the harm that the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) is causing to the poultry, dairy and livestock sectors and related businesses--and by extension to consumers--by increasing competition for corn during a severe drought that has sharply constrained supply.  The EPA's detailed response made frequent references to the "high statutory threshold of severe harm to the economy" required for a waiver of the RFS, and to the output of a model simulating the market for corn and ethanol. It also included the extraordinary assertion that, "the RFS volume requirements will have no impact on ethanol production volumes in the relevant time frame, and therefore will have no impact on corn, food, or fuel prices."  If that were true, then it's not obvious why the mandate should exist at all.

In rejecting pleas for relaxation of the ethanol standard, the EPA appears to be relying on two key facts.  First, wholesale ethanol prices remain lower than wholesale gasoline prices, despite corn prices that are high enough to force many ethanol producers to cut back output.  I'd attribute that mainly to weak US gasoline demand and the much-discussed impact of the "blend wall" in limiting ethanol to 10% of the gasoline pool, rather than as a sign of an unaffected market.  The agency is also relying on the availability of "paper ethanol" in the form of Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits from past over-blending of ethanol by refiners and other gasoline blenders.  The EPA's estimate puts the number of available RINs at the equivalent of 2-3 billion gallons, or around 20% of this year's 13.2 billion gallon conventional ethanol requirement. As a result of these factors, EPA can claim with some justification that ethanol prices are not harming motorists at the gas pump at this time.  That's small consolation to the petitioners.

EPA's assurances to those in the poultry, dairy and livestock value chains are based on much thinner evidence--in fact, on none at all, unless you count as evidence a model that predicts corn prices would only fall by $0.58 per bushel if the ethanol mandate were eliminated entirely.  Simulations are useful but still aren't reality. The output of a model is only as good as its assumptions and algorithms, and when that output defies logic, it calls for the application of good judgment, particularly when the result happens to align so neatly with the internal concerns about the long-term implications of a waiver that are evident in the agency's response.  I can't help concluding that an agency whose management possessed greater depth and breadth of experience outside of government--especially in the business sector--would have given more weight to the struggles of the dairies, ranchers, meat-packers and others who are being squeezed by a mandate that is projected to consume 42% of this year's corn crop and is very likely inflating the cost of the Thanksgiving meal that many of my US readers will eat on Thursday.   This administration's lack of outside experience has been a glaring shortcoming that the President could easily remedy as turnover creates openings at the start of his second term. 

I can't say that I'm surprised by the EPA's ruling on the waiver requests.  I also can't help wondering whether it provides any indication of how the administration is likely to deal with the other issues that were deferred until after the election.  Yet even if we can't read anything else into this decision, it's clear that the Renewable Fuel Standard enacted in 2007--before the financial crisis and recession--is in serious need of reform.  If its language doesn't require the EPA to adjust the ethanol mandate in light of a drought that will result in the smallest corn crop since 2006, when US ethanol production was 65% lower than last year, then the law simply didn't incorporate sufficient foresight about possible future events.  Together with its unrealistically ambitious cellulosic biofuel standard, the provisions of the RFS increasingly seem to relate to some other, parallel universe, rather than the one in which we live.  

Senin, 12 November 2012

Is Gas Rationing Superior to Raising Prices for Consumers?

With New Jersey about to end the odd-even gasoline rationing  imposed in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, we have an opportunity to consider whether this kind of response actually produces better outcomes than the price increases by which the market would normally balance supply and demand.  Most of the defenses of "price gouging" that I've seen, including Matthew Yglesias's recent posting in Slate, tend to focus mainly on its supply-side aspects. Yet such arguments, however well-reasoned, are unlikely to sway Americans from their innate sense of fairness, on which most anti-gouging regulations are premised.  That's inherent in the judgmental term itself.  However, having spent my share of time in gas lines during the energy crises of the 1970s, I believe that supporters of these rules are ignoring some even more pragmatic, consumer-based arguments for allowing prices to rise after a disaster.

In addition to the tragic loss of life and property inflicted by Sandy, the storm left the petroleum products infrastructure on which New Jersey depends paralyzed for days.  Refineries were shut down, distribution terminals full of gasoline were unable to deliver product, and gas stations without power had no way to sell the fuel stored in the tanks under their forecourts.  This combination represented a huge supply shock to the region, and it wasn't long before gas lines formed at those stations that had both product and electricity.  New Jersey has strict and specific anti-gouging rules and is already charging merchants with violations following Sandy.  Within a few days, in an effort to alleviate the queuing that resulted from the supply shortfall and the inability of retailers to raise prices, Governor Christie resorted to rationing by license plate number.

Although restricting prices might superficially appear more equitable--particularly for lower-income consumers--than allowing them to climb to the levels necessary to clear the market without long lines, it also imposes significant costs on all consumers.  For starters, anti-gouging rules effectively confine motorists to their vehicles precisely when they have many other urgent priorities, including attending to their families and homes. They also implicitly put a very low monetary value on consumers' time.  Waiting on line for four hours to obtain 10 gallons of gas at a pre-disaster price of $3.50/gal., instead of experiencing a much shorter wait to purchase fuel for $5.00/gal., is equivalent to being paid $3.75 per hour--around half the state's official minimum wage.  This situation also increases the chances that an individual will wait for hours only to see the station run out of fuel before his or her turn comes, because demand is unchanged or temporarily higher than before the crisis.  Adding odd/even rationing might reduce gas lines by limiting demand and breaking the psychology contributing to the lines, but it also compounds the harm to consumers, some of whom are left with no legal means of acquiring fuel when they need it most.

I don't expect politicians and regulators suddenly to embrace a purely market-based approach towards post-disaster pricing of necessities like fuel.  However, we ought to expect them to look at the real-world results of their policies and apply some common sense and creativity to improve how they function.  Anti-gouging rules clearly benefit some at the expense of others. How could we simultaneously preserve the benefits for the first group, while allowing those willing to pay a premium for emergency supplies to do so, in the process sending the appropriate price signal to reduce overall demand? One solution might be to allow gas stations with multiple pump islands to raise prices as long as they have at least one set of pumps offering the pre-disaster price.   Technology should provide even more innovative and effective options.

Given the magnitude of the supply disruption post-Sandy, there was no way to avoid a serious shortage of motor fuel in the affected region.  However, the appearance of long gas lines and the resort to a 1970's expedient of odd-even rationing shouldn't satisfy anyone concerning the effectiveness of the pre-existing emergency energy policies that were called into play following the storm.  I can't imagine New Jerseyans being content with the outcome they experienced.